Clinical Association among GRACE score and SYNTAX score in Non ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome patients

Authors

  • Suresh Kumar Bolan Medical College, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan
  • Kashif Saleem Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore
  • Naresh Kumar Khurana Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore
  • Tariq Shakoor Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Nighat Saleh Institute of Public Health, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan
  • Mohsin Raza Khan Fedral Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55958/jcvd.v19i4.158

Keywords:

Cardiovascular disease, mortality prediction, GRACE score, Syntax Scoring

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology advocate utilization of variety of risk assessment tools for assessment of ischemia. 1, 2

OBJECTIVE: To find association among GRACE and SYNTAX scores in acute coronary syndrome individuals excluding STEMI.

METHADOLOGY: This research was carried out in Cardiology Department of Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore over a period of 6 months. Total 273 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were included in this research project. All patients underwent an examination for the calculation of GRACE risk score. After cardiac catheterization, SYNTAX score was calculated. The researcher personally calculated both scores. The parameters was recorded on a pre- designed proforma.

RESULTS: The patients exhibited mean age of 54.81 ± 13.14 years, spanning a range from 30 to 80 years. A higher male-to-female ratio was observe with 164(60.07%) cases being male and 109(39.93%) cases being female. The mean duration of diagnosis was 14.35 ± 5.23 hours with minimum and maximum duration as 6 and 23 hours. The mean Grace risk score was 137.40 ± 13.52 and the syntax score exhibited mean value of 28.68 ± 3. There was correlation of 0.775 among Grace risk score and Syntax score, with significant p-value i.e. < 0.001.

CONCLUSION: A robust positive association exists among GRACE and SYNTAX scores in non-STEMI acute coronary syndrome patients. Hence, grace and syntax score may be applied in our clinical setting for identification of high risk patients (with higher GRACE score) with acute coronary having lower health resources is of much importance to avoid unnecessary work up in low risk patients (low GRACE score) and accurate referral of high risk patients for further workup and management.

Author Biographies

Suresh Kumar, Bolan Medical College, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan

Assistant Professor Medicine

Kashif Saleem, Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore

Post Graduate Resident Cardiology

Tariq Shakoor, Central Park Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

Assistant Professor of Cardiology

Nighat Saleh, Institute of Public Health, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan

MPH trainee

Mohsin Raza Khan, Fedral Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan

Demonstrator

References

Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, Lucia A. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(13):256-.

Wu AH, Christenson RH, Greene DN, Jaffe AS, Kavsak PA, Ordonez-Llanos J, et al. Clinical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin in acute coronary syndrome: expert opinion from the Academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and the Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clinic Chemist. 2018;64(4):645-55.

Raposeiras-Roubín S, Faxén J, Íñiguez-Romo A, Henriques JPS, D'Ascenzo F, Saucedo J, et al. Development and external validation of a post-discharge bleeding risk score in patients with acute coronary syndrome: The BleeMACS score. Int J Cardiol. 2018;254:10-5.

Sallehuddin HM, Azman S, Noor SM, Faisal U, Pillai S, Aziz AA. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Risk Score in Predicting Outcome in Elderly Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction at 6 Months After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Hospital Serdang. Int J Cardiol. 2017;249:S32-S3.

Silvano GP, Silva LS, Faria ECdC, Trevisol DJ. The GRACE score is not a good predictor of angiographic complexity in acute coronary syndrome. J Transcat Intervent. 2019;27:eA201826.

Witberg G, Zusman O, Codner P, Assali A, Kornowski R. Impact of coronary artery revascularization completeness on outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of studies using the residual SYNTAX score (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery). Circulation: Cardiovas Intervent. 2018;11(3):e006000.

Robbins J, Gelfand EV. Unstable Angina and Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Comprehensive Cardiovascular Medicine in the Primary Care Setting: Springer; 2019. p. 233-59.

Zafara F, Akbarb AM, Tariqa A, Masoodc M. Correlation between grace and syntax scores in patients with acute coronary syndrom. J Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;14(3):64-7.

Hammami R, Jdidi J, Mroua F, Kallel R, Hentati M, Abid L, et al. Accuracy of the TIMI and GRACE scores in predicting coronary disease in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Rev Port Cardiol. 2018;37(1):41-9.

Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet J-P, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2015;73(12):1207-94.

Serruys PW, Morice M-C, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10):961-72.

Saha T, Khalequzzaman M, Akanda MAK, Saha S, Tushar AZ, Ahmed R, et al. Association of GRACE risk score with angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc J. 2015;8(1):30-4.

Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018;76(2):229-313.

Sianos G, Morel M-A, Kappetein AP, Morice M-C, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. Interv Cardiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2005;1(2):219-27.

Chotechuang Y, Phrommintikul A, Kuanprasert S, Muenpa R, Ruengorn C, Patumanond J, et al. GRACE score and cardiovascular outcomes prediction among the delayed coronary intervention after post-fibrinolytic STEMI patients in a limited PCI-capable hospital. Open Heart J. 2020;7(1):e001133.

Sofidis G, Otountzidis N, Stalikas N, Karagiannidis E, Papazoglou AS, Moysidis DV, et al. Association of GRACE Risk Score with Coronary Artery Disease Complexity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Clin Med. 2021;10(10):2210.

Rahmani R, Majidi B, Ariannejad H, Shafiee A. The value of the grace score for predicting the syntax score in patients with unstable angina/non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020;21(4):514-7.

Hammami R, Jdidi J, Mroua F, Kallel R, Hentati M, Abid L, et al. Accuracy of the TIMI and GRACE scores in predicting coronary disease in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia. 2018;37(1):41-9.

Gupta A, Wang Y, Spertus JA, Geda M, Lorenze N, Nkonde-Price C, et al. Trends in acute myocardial infarction in young patients and differences by sex and race, 2001 to 2010. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(4):337-45.

Published

2024-03-28

Issue

Section

Articles