To compare the early patency and survival rate of coronary grafts in On-Pump vs Off-pump CABG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55958/jcvd.v18i3.105Keywords:
Off-pump CABG, On-Pump CABG, Patent and Blocked graftsAbstract
Introduction: A large number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) encounter surgical cardiopulmonary bypass [on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) or off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)]. Since two techniques have been commenced, the doubt of which one is more convincing and efficacious has always been discussed and is still controversial.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the early patency and survival rate of coronary grafts after CABG in On-Pump vs Off-pump groups.
Material and methods: This retrospective cross sectional study was conducted in the Cardiac surgery department of Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore in year 2020 using the data of previous surgeries done from 01-01-2009 to 01-03-2010 (14 months). Total 792 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were included. The data consisted of two groups Group-A ONCAB (341) and Group B OPCAB (451), with total number of grafts (2333). Out of 792 patients only 315 were followed up the same year and in 2020, 135 were followed up for survival rate. The sampling technique used in this study was non probability sampling.
Results: The mean age of the patients in Group A was 56.13 ±9.305 years and in Group B was 53.9 ± 9.382 years. In 315 followed up patients the number of grafts applied were 949. The mean number of grafts applied in Group A was 3.11±0.949 and in Group B was 2.95±0.959. There was no statistically significant difference seen between these groups. Out of 949 grafts 795 were patent from which 410 were applied in group A and 385 were applied in group B. 154 were blocked out of which 67 were applied in group A and 87 were applied in group B. After 10 years, only 135 were followed for survival rate, out of which 22.22% had angioplasty done, 51.85% reported events of shortness of breath, 13.33% had another attack of myocardial infarction, 30.37% had angiography done and mortality rate was 14.07%. There were 85.4% patients still alive in Group A and 86.8% in Group B. The overall survival rate is 85.9%.
Conclusion: In overall comparison there is no significant difference in patency and occlusion rate. However, the survival rate is 85.9%. So we can say both groups are equally safe and no procedure is preferred over another, entailing an identical caliber of anastomosis.
References
Seki T, Yoshida T. Comparison of mid-term graft patency between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017;23(3):141-8.
Károlyi M, Eberhard M, Gloor T, Polacin M, Manka R, Savic V, Plass AR, Vogt PR, Alkadhi H, Schmiady MO. Routine early postoperative computed tomography angiography after coronary artery bypass surgery: clinical value and management implications. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2021 Aug 19.
Shroyer AL, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Baltz JH, Quin JA, Almassi GH, Kozora E, Bakaeen F, Cleveland Jr JC, Bishawi M. Five-year outcomes after on-pump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):623-32.
Harker LA, Malpass TW, Branson HE, Hessel EA, Slichter SJ. Mechanism of abnormal bleeding in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: acquired transient platelet dysfunction associated with selective alpha-granule release. Blood. 1980;56:824-34.
Kon ZN, Kwon MH, Collins MJ, Kallam S, Sangrampurkar R, Ozeki T, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass leads to a regional hypercoagulable state not detectable using systemic markers. Innovations (Phila). 2006;1:232-8
Nakao, T and Kawaue, Y. Effect of coronary revascularization with the right gastroepiploic artery (Comparative examination of angiographic findings in the early postoperative period) . J ThoracCardiovasc Surg. 1993; 106: 149–153
Tatsuya Seki, MD. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, JCHO Hokkaido Hospital, 1 jo 8 chome 3-18 Nakanoshima, Toyohira-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 062-8618, Japan Email: sekky48@yahoo.co.jp ©2017 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. All rights reserved.
Houlind K, Fenger-Grøn M, Holme SJ, Kjeldsen BJ, Madsen SN, Rasmussen BS, Jepsen MH, Ravkilde J, Aaroe J, Hansen PR, Hansen HS. Graft patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is inferior even with identical heparinization protocols: results from the Danish On-pump Versus Off-pump Randomization Study (DOORS). The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2014 Nov 1;148(5):1812-9.
Gianni D. Angelini, MCh, MD, FRCS, FETCS,a Lucy Culliford, BSc, MSc, PhD,a David K. Smith, BSc, MRCP,a Mark C. K. Hamilton, MRCP, FRCR,b Gavin J. Murphy, BSc, ChB, MD, FRCS(CTh),a RaimondoAscione, MD, MCh, FRCS, FETCS,a Andreas Baumbach, MD, FRCP, FESC,b and Barnaby C. Reeves, BA, MSc, DPhila
Kumada Y, Yoshitani K, Shimabara Y, Ohnishi Y. Perioperative risk factors for acute kidney injury after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective study. JA clinical reports. 2017 Dec;3(1):1-8.
Daniel Fudulu, Umberto Benedetto, Gustavo GuidaPecchinenda, PierpaoloChivasso, Vito Domenico Bruno, FilippoRapetto, Alan Bryan, Gianni DavideAngelini Aug 24, 2016. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.80
Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery (DrsPuskas, Williams, and Guyton and Mss McCall, Petersen, and Bailey), Cardiology (Drs Huber, Block, Marshall, and Leimbach), and Cardiac Anesthesiology (Drs Duke, Staples, and Glas), Emory University School of Medicine and Emory Center for Outcomes Research (Drs Williams and Weintraub), Atlanta, Ga; and the New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Mass (Dr Mahoney).
Hussain G, Azam H, RazaBaig MA, Ahmad N. Early outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(4):917-921. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.9680
AlWaqfi NR, Ibrahim KS. Stroke after coronary artery surgery: a single center report. International Journal of Angiology. 2014 Sep;23(03):171-6.
Kobayashi J, Tashiro T, Ochi M, et al. Early outcome of a randomized comparison of off-pump and onpump multiple arterial coronary revascularization. Circulation 2005; 112: I338-43.
Puskas JD, Williams WH, O’Donnell R, et al. Offpump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting are associated with similar graft patency, myocardial ischemia, and freedom from reintervention: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. Ann ThoracSurg 2011; 91: 1836-42; discussion 1842-3
Sousa Uva M, Cavaco S, Oliveira AG, et al. Early graft patency after off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J 2010;31: 2492–9.
Al-Ruzzeh S, George S, Bustami M, et al. Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2006;332:1365
Mølstad, P., Moer, R. and Rødevand, O., 2016. Long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention. Open heart, 3(2).
