Evaluation of the applicability of Light’s criteria for differentiation of transudates from exudates across different serous fluids

Authors

  • Ambereen Anwar Imran Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore
  • Sadaf Farzand Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55958/jcvd.v18i1.94

Keywords:

Pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, light’s criteria, transudate, exudate

Abstract

Background: Serous fluids like pericardial, pleural and ascitic fluids are frequently submitted for pathological evaluation. The differentiation of these fluids into transudates and exudates is the prime aim of the evaluation as this determines the patients’ further management. Light’s criteria, proposed about 50 years ago, utilize various biochemical parameters for this differentiation and are the most widely used criteria.

Materials and Methods: This study was carried-out in Pathology department of Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore. 60 serous fluid samples, including pericardial, pleural and ascitic fluids were analyzed routinely and classified into transudates and exudates applying Light’s criteria. The proportion of transudates and exudates were compared amongst different fluids by applying chi-square test, keeping level of significance at p-value <0.05. Cytological examination was reported according to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology.

Results: Most of the fluids, i.e., 44 out of 60 were exudates. This trend was most pronounced for pericardial fluids where 29 out of 31 were exudates. 13 pleural fluids out of 23 were exudative while only 2 out of 6 ascitic fluids were exudative. On cytological examination, 55 fluids were negative for malignant cells, 2 fluids harbored atypical cells and 3 were positive for malignant cells. Careful gross examination of fluids furnished vital information in many cases.

Conclusion: Light’s criteria may not be equally applicable across all types of fluids. In our study it had a high sensitivity but low specificity for pericardial exudates. Hence, modification of the criteria may be required to enhance its validity. Careful gross and cytological examination may provide additional invaluable information that could significantly impact management strategies.

Keywords:  Pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, light’s criteria, transudate, exudate.

Author Biographies

Ambereen Anwar Imran, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore

Professor of Pathology

Sadaf Farzand, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore

Consultant Pathologist.

References

Kopcinovic LM, Culej J. Pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions - a biochemical approach. Biochem Med 2014; 24(1):123-37.

Ibrahim A, Rida A, Malass I, Tayara l. Etiology of pleural effusion among adults in three university hospitals in Beirut: a one-year retrospective cross sectional analytical study. Int J Respir Pulm Med 2021; 8:149.

Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, Ball WC Jr. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77(4):507-13.

Buoro S, Tombetti E, Ceriotti F, Simon C, Cugola D, Seghezzi M, et al. What is the normal composition of pericardial fluid? Heart 2021; 107(19):1584-90.

Saguil A, Kristen W, John H. Diagnostic approach to pleural effusion. Am Fam Physic 2014; 90(2):99-104.

Quantrill SJ, Dabal L. Transudates and exudates. Thorax 2002; 57:657.

Porcel JM, Light RW. Diagnostic approach to pleural effusion in adults. Am Fam Physician 2006; 73(7):1211-20.

Rodriguez EF, Jones R, Gabrielson M, Santos D, Pastorello RG, Maleki Z. Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) on Reporting Pericardial Effusion Cytology. Acta Cytol 2020;64(5):477-485.

Pinto D, Chandra A, Schmitt F. The international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: how to incorporate molecular data in cytopathology reports. J Mol Pathol 2021; 2: 66–76.

Iqbal M, Jaffery T, Shah SH. Isolated pleural fluid lactic dehydrogenase level: a cost-effective way of characterizing pleural effusions. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2002;14(2):2-5.

Burgess LJ, Reuter H, Taljaard JJ, Doubell AF. Role of biochemical tests in the diagnosis of large pericardial effusions. Chest 2002; 121(2):495-9.

Antonangelo L, Vargas FS, Acencio MM, Carnevale GG, Corá AP, Teixeira LR, et al. Pleural fluid: Are temperature and storage time critical preanalytical error factors in biochemical analyses? Clin Chim Acta 2010; 411:1275-8.

Na MJ. Diagnostic tools of pleural effusion. Tuberc Respir Dis 2014;76(5):199-210.

Meenakshisundaram R, Sweni S, Thirumalaikolundusubramanian P. Cardiac isoform of alpha 2 macroglobulin: a marker of cardiac involvement in pediatric HIV and AIDS. Pediatr Cardiol 2010; 31(2):203-7.

Romero S, Martinez A, Hernandez L, Fernandez C, Espasa A, Candela A, et al. Light's criteria revisited: consistency and comparison with new proposed alternative criteria for separating pleural transudates from exudates. Respiration 2000; 67:18–23.

Gazquez I, Porcel JM, Vives M, Vicente de Vera MC, Rubio M, Rivas MC. Comparative analysis of Light's criteria and other biochemical parameters for distinguishing transudates from exudates. Respir Med 1998; 92:762–5.

Ben-Horin S, Bank I, Shinfeld A, Kachel E, Guetta V, Livneh A. Diagnostic value of the biochemical composition of pericardial effusions in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99(9):1294-7.

Imazio M, Biondo A, Ricci D, Boffini M, Pivetta E, Brucato A, et al. Contemporary biochemical analysis of normal pericardial fluid. Heart 2020; 106:541-544.

Fender EA, Zack CJ. Shining a new light on pericardial fluid. Heart 2021; 107:1528-1529.

Porcel JM. Handling pleural fluid samples for routine analyses. Derleme 2013; 19-22.

Porcel JM. Pearls and myths in pleural fluid analysis. Respirology 2011; 16(1):44-52.

Nakhleh RE, Gephardt G, Zarbo RJ. Necessity of clinical information in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123(7):615-9.

Imran AA, Khan SA, Chaudrhy NA, Tayyib M. Temperature Independence of Wisconsin solution as a Tissue Preservation Fluid Compared with EC Solution and Ringer Lactate. Pak Postgrad Med J 2003; 14: 27-30.

Imran AA. Delving Deeper into the Dilemma of Cytomorphological Deterioration due to Drying Artefact: Detailed Description of a Different Technique. JFJMC 2013; 7: 86-90.

Antonangelo L, Vargas FS, Acencio MM, Carnevale GG, Corá AP, Teixeira LR, et al. Pleural fluid: Are temperature and storage time critical preanalytical error factors in biochemical analyses? Clin Chim Acta 2010; 411:1275-8.

Ling CL, Roberts T, Soeng S, Cusack TP, Dance DAB, Lee SJ, et al. Impact of delays to incubation and storage temperature on blood culture results: a multi-centre study. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:173.

Published

2022-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles