Frequency of atrioventricular block in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and to compare the outcome in patients with or without atrioventricular block

Authors

  • Nauman Saleem Punjab Institute of Cardiology
  • Sajjad Ahmad Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore
  • Zohaib Sadiq Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore
  • Gulshan Ahmed Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore
  • Jawad Ahmed Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore
  • Salman Munir Rehbar Rangers Medical College, Lahore.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55958/jcvd.v18i1.21

Abstract

Background:

In some cases of acute inferior wall myocardial infarction, atrioventricular (AV) block is known to be reversible. AV block is associated with certain complications. This study to find the frequency of AV block and related complications in local population.

Aims and objective:

The objective of the study was to establish the frequency of atrioventricular block in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to compare the outcome in patients with or without atrioventricular block

Material and methods:

Thiscross sectional study was carried-out at the department of Cardiology, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore over a period of six months.Patients were screened for AV block. During hospital stay, patients were assessed for congestive heart failure, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and mortality. Patients with and without AV block were compared by using chi-square test.

Results:

In our study, the mean age of patients was 61.00±11.75years. There were 242 (50.4%) males while 238 (49.6%) females. AV block was present in 95 (19.8%) patients while 385 (80.2%) did not develop AV block. Congestive heart failure was present in 50 (52.6%) patients with AV block while in 62 (16.1%)patient without AV block. Cardiogenic shock was present in 27 (28.4%) patients with AV block while in 30 (7.8%) patients without AV block. Cardiac arrest was present in 34 (35.8%) patients with AV block while in 42 (10.9%)patient without AV block. Death occurred in 28 (29.5%) patients with AV block while in 19 (4.9%)patient without AV block. The difference was significant (p<0.05) for all outcomes in both groups.

Conclusion

The frequency of AV block was although low but the complications were significantly high in patients with AV block.

Key words

Atrioventricular block, acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, congestive heart failure, death

Author Biographies

Nauman Saleem, Punjab Institute of Cardiology

Senior Registrar Cardiology

Sajjad Ahmad, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore

Professor of Cardiology

Zohaib Sadiq, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore

Senior Registrar Cardiology

Gulshan Ahmed, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore

Senior Registrar Cardiology

Jawad Ahmed, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore

Senior Registrar Cardiology

Salman Munir, Rehbar Rangers Medical College, Lahore.

Consultant Cardiologist

References

Ramasamy I. Biochemical markers in acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chim Acta 2011;412(15):1279-96.

Sanon S, Patel R, Eshelbrenner C, Sanon VP, Alhaddad M, Oliveros R, et al. Acute coronary syndrome in patients with diabetes mellitus: perspectives of an interventional cardiologist. Am J Cardiol 2012;110(9):13B-23B.

Cardoso R, Alfonso CE, Coffey JO. Reversibility of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block with Revascularization in Coronary Artery Disease without Infarction: A Literature Review. Case Rep Cardiol 2016;2016.

Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, DiMarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NM, et al. 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(3):e6-e75.

Saleh F, Greene EA, Mathison D. Evaluation and management of atrioventricular block in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 2014;26(3):279-85.

Singh SM, FitzGerald G, Yan AT, Brieger D, Fox KA, López-Sendón J, et al. High-grade atrioventricular block in acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Eur Heart J 2014:ehu357.

Gang UJO, Hvelplund A, Pedersen S, Iversen A, Jøns C, Abildstrøm SZ, et al. High-degree atrioventricular block complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Europace 2012;14(11):1639-45.

Aplin M, Engstrøm T, Vejlstrup NG, Clemmensen P, Torp-Pedersen C, Køber L, et al. Prognostic importance of complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction. The American journal of cardiology 2003;92(7):853-6.

Meine TJ, Al-Khatib SM, Alexander JH, Granger CB, White HD, Kilaru R, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of high-degree atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. American heart journal 2005;149(4):670-4.

Harpaz D, Behar S, Gottlieb S, Boyko V, Kishon Y, Eldar M, et al. Complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1999;34(6):1721-8.

Nguyen HL, Lessard D, Spencer FA, Yarzebski J, Zevallos JC, Gore JM, et al. Thirty-year trends (1975-2005) in the magnitude and hospital death rates associated with complete heart block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. American heart journal 2008;156(2):227-33.

Auffret V, Loirat A, Leurent G, Martins RP, Filippi E, Coudert I, et al. High-degree atrioventricular block complicating ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the contemporary era. Heart 2016;102(1):40-9.

Gupta M, Singh M, Wahal P, Mehrotra M, Gupta S. Complete heart block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Angiology 1978;29(10):749-57.

Feigl D, Ashkenazy J, Kishon Y. Early and late atrioventricular block in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1984;4(1):35-8.

Published

2022-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles